Buckelew v. Chipman

5 Cal. 399
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Cal. 399 (Buckelew v. Chipman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buckelew v. Chipman, 5 Cal. 399 (Cal. 1855).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Murray, C. J., and Bryan, J., concurred.

This is a bill in equity for relief against a judgment at law, and a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence.

The rule in such cases is, that to entitle the complainant to relief, the newly discovered evidence must appear to be incontrovertible and conclusive.

In this case it consists of the testimony of one witness, whereas the bill states that the judgment at law was obtained upon the testimony of two witnesses, and the issue was upon a single fact. The just inference is, that upon a new trial the result of the issue would be the same.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Stevinson
166 P. 338 (California Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cal. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buckelew-v-chipman-cal-1855.