Buck v. Uplinger

99 P. 1134, 79 Kan. 858
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJanuary 12, 1909
DocketNo. 15,777
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 P. 1134 (Buck v. Uplinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buck v. Uplinger, 99 P. 1134, 79 Kan. 858 (kan 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The main question is whether the court erred in finding that the deed from Buck to Uplinger of January 7, 1893, did not convey the ditch and the water-rights. Ordinarily these rights would pass with a warranty deed as appurtenant to the land, but the court finds that such was not the intention of the parties. On every question raised plaintiffs are concluded by the findings of fact. Plaintiffs filed no request for additional findings or motion to modify those made, but rested with an objection to each finding as not sustained by sufficient evidence. Every finding is supported by evidence, and, under the authority of Shuler v. Lashhorn, 67 Kan. 694, 74 Pac. 264, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boner v. Texas Co.
57 P.2d 420 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 P. 1134, 79 Kan. 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buck-v-uplinger-kan-1909.