Buck v. Turritin

202 N.W. 745, 162 Minn. 519, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1549
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Buck v. Turritin. Read the opinion of the Court — 159 Minn. 353
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 13, 1925·No. No. 24,622.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action to set aside, as in fraud of plaintiff’s rights as a creditor of defendant Turritin, a transfer of money belonging to her to defendants Bouck and Rice National Bank, the purpose of which was to pay the debt of another to the bank, which, according to the complaint, was charged with knowledge of the character of the transaction and of the legal fraud thereby attempted. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained; judgment for defendants was entered and plaintiff appeals.

On its facts, this ease is similar to and on principle parallel with Buck v. Turritin, 159 Minn. 353, 198 N. W. 1006. Its decision is controlled by the opinion in that case. Accordingly, for the reasons there stated, the judgment is reversed.

WILSON, C. J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buck v. Turritin, 202 N.W. 745, 162 Minn. 519, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1549 (Mich. 1925).

202 N.W. 745 (Buck v. Turritin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buck v. Turritin
198 N.W. 1006 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1924)