Buck v. Reminderville
This text of 2012 Ohio 1580 (Buck v. Reminderville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Buck v. Reminderville, 132 Ohio St.3d 24, 2012-Ohio-1580.]
BUCK, APPELLEE, v. VILLAGE OF REMINDERVILLE, APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as Buck v. Reminderville, 132 Ohio St.3d 24, 2012-Ohio-1580.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Sampson v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth. (No. 2011-0258—Submitted March 21, 2012—Decided April 12, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 25272, 2010-Ohio-6497. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Sampson v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth., 131 Ohio St.3d 418, 2012-Ohio-570, 966 N.E.2d 247. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Kenneth D. Myers, for appellee. Tomino & Latchney, L.L.C., L.P.A., and John D. Latchney, for appellant. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 1580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buck-v-reminderville-ohio-2012.