Buck v. Ooms

D.C. Circuit

Buck v. Ooms

159 F.2d 462, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 2

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 3, 1947

DocketNo. 9273

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 F.2d 462 (Buck v. Ooms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buck v. Ooms, 159 F.2d 462, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 2 (D.C. Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C. § 63, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, appellant seeks a patent on a supposed method and means for generating power. The device consists essentially of a combination of a motor-driven pump, an arrangement of pipes somewhat similar to a syphon, a motor operated by water which flows through the pipes, and a pulley operated by this latter motor. Unless the device can deliver more power at the pulley than is supplied to it by the motor that drives the pump, which is impossible, it can serve no useful purpose. The claims were therefore rightly rej ected.

Affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C. § 63, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, appellant seeks a patent on a supposed method and means for generating power. The device consists essentially of a combination of a motor-driven pump, an arrangement of pipes somewhat similar to a syphon, a motor operated by water which flows through the pipes, and a pulley operated by this latter motor. Unless the device can deliver more power at the pulley than is supplied to it by the motor that drives the pump, which is impossible, it can serve no useful purpose. The claims were therefore rightly rej ected.

Affirmed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 F.2d 462, 82 U.S. App. D.C. 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buck-v-ooms-cadc-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack