Buck v. Kent Security of Broward, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Buck v. Kent Security of Broward, Inc.

638 So. 2d 1004, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5885, 1994 WL 261420

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 15, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1584

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 638 So. 2d 1004 (Buck v. Kent Security of Broward, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buck v. Kent Security of Broward, Inc., 638 So. 2d 1004, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5885, 1994 WL 261420 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants leased storage space in a storage facility. When their goods were stolen appellants sued the security firm providing protection to the facility alleging they were third party beneficiaries of the contract between the facility and the firm. However, their own lease, which was attached to the complaint, negates the allegation that they could be third party beneficiaries, thus rendering the pleading objectionable and subject to dismissal. Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. Lasseter, 247 So.2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). We also reject their contention that appellee could be liable as a volunteer.

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants leased storage space in a storage facility. When their goods were stolen appellants sued the security firm providing protection to the facility alleging they were third party beneficiaries of the contract between the facility and the firm. However, their own lease, which was attached to the complaint, negates the allegation that they could be third party beneficiaries, thus rendering the pleading objectionable and subject to dismissal. Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. Lasseter, 247 So.2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). We also reject their contention that appellee could be liable as a volunteer.

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

638 So. 2d 1004, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5885, 1994 WL 261420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buck-v-kent-security-of-broward-inc-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack