Buck v. ITN/Grate Pallet, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Buck v. ITN/Grate Pallet, Inc.

892 So. 2d 560, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1230, 2005 WL 277919

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 2005·No. No. 1D04-4441·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to this Court’s order of October 26, 2004, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. [561]*561See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla.1974); Bennett’s Leasing Inc. v. First Street Mortgage Corp., 870 So.2d 93, 97-98 n. 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Specifically, the order on appeal reserved jurisdiction to determine whether or not certain property will be included in the proposed sale of the assignor’s property. Such a reservation necessarily renders the order on appeal nonfinal.

ERVIN, BROWNING, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to this Court’s order of October 26, 2004, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. [561]*561See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla.1974); Bennett’s Leasing Inc. v. First Street Mortgage Corp., 870 So.2d 93, 97-98 n. 4 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Specifically, the order on appeal reserved jurisdiction to determine whether or not certain property will be included in the proposed sale of the assignor’s property. Such a reservation necessarily renders the order on appeal nonfinal.

ERVIN, BROWNING, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Buck v. ITN/Grate Pallet, Inc., 892 So. 2d 560, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1230, 2005 WL 277919 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

892 So. 2d 560 (Buck v. ITN/Grate Pallet, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related