Buck v. Greenlee

465 F. App'x 244
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2012·No. No. 11-2189·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Randell E. Buck appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buck v. Greenlee, No. 3:10-cv00540-RJC-DSC, 2011 WL 4595262 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buck v. Greenlee, 465 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2012).

465 F. App'x 244 (Buck v. Greenlee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related