Bucio-Uc v. Gonzales
This text of 214 F. App'x 664 (Bucio-Uc v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Juan Bucio-Uc petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affirmance of an order of deportation issued by an Immigration Judge. Because he raises a question of law, we have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). We deny the petition.
Under former INA § 321(a), a child could derive United States citizenship solely from his mother’s naturalization if the child’s father never legitimated paternity.1 Whether Bucio-Uc’s father legitimated paternity is governed by California law.2 Under California law, Bucio-Uc’s father clearly legitimated paternity.3 Thus, Bucio-Uc did not derive United States citizenship solely from his mother’s naturalization.
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 F. App'x 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bucio-uc-v-gonzales-ca9-2006.