Buchy v. State

664 So. 2d 1064, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12609
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 1995
DocketNos. 94-04011, 94-04012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 664 So. 2d 1064 (Buchy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buchy v. State, 664 So. 2d 1064, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12609 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

THREADGILL, Chief Judge.

The appellant challenges a judgment and sentence for escape and an order revoking probation on a prior offense. We affirm the escape conviction, the revocation of probation, and the sentences. We strike, however, a $2.00 cost assessed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because it was not orally pronounced at sentencing. This cost is a discretionary cost which must be individually announced at sentencing to give the defendant an opportunity to object. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111, 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed; cost stricken.

SCHOONOVER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilchrist v. State
674 So. 2d 847 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
664 So. 2d 1064, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchy-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.