Buchwald v. Waldron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buchwald v. Waldron

174 A.D.2d 895, 572 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8371

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 A.D.2d 895 (Buchwald v. Waldron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchwald v. Waldron, 174 A.D.2d 895, 572 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered May 10, 1990 in Warren County, upon a decision of the court in favor of plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s only contention on appeal is that, based on the evidence presented at the nonjury trial, Supreme Court’s award of $300 in damages for defendant’s breach of contract was inadequate. Supreme Court has failed to indicate the rationale and factual basis for its determination of damages (see, CPLR 4213 [b]), thereby precluding effective appellate review. Consequently, we must remit for a detailed finding as to how the court arrived at its calculation of damages (see, Woodruff v Castaldo, 110 AD2d 1040, 1041-1042; Novak & Co. v Facilities Dev. Corp., 109 AD2d 1013, 1014).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is withheld, and matter [896]*896remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered May 10, 1990 in Warren County, upon a decision of the court in favor of plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s only contention on appeal is that, based on the evidence presented at the nonjury trial, Supreme Court’s award of $300 in damages for defendant’s breach of contract was inadequate. Supreme Court has failed to indicate the rationale and factual basis for its determination of damages (see, CPLR 4213 [b]), thereby precluding effective appellate review. Consequently, we must remit for a detailed finding as to how the court arrived at its calculation of damages (see, Woodruff v Castaldo, 110 AD2d 1040, 1041-1042; Novak & Co. v Facilities Dev. Corp., 109 AD2d 1013, 1014).

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is withheld, and matter [896]*896remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A.D.2d 895, 572 N.Y.S.2d 653, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchwald-v-waldron-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack