Buchwald v. Silverman Shin & Byrne PLLC

2017 NY Slip Op 2955, 149 A.D.3d 560, 50 N.Y.S.3d 272
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 2017
Docket3773 155828/13
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2955 (Buchwald v. Silverman Shin & Byrne PLLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buchwald v. Silverman Shin & Byrne PLLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 2955, 149 A.D.3d 560, 50 N.Y.S.3d 272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered or about July 11, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff, no triable issues of fact exist as to whether defendant discriminated against plaintiff based on a perceived disability. Defendant’s alleged conduct consists of “petty slights or trivial inconveniences” that do not suffice to support a hostile work environment claim under the New York City Human Rights Law (see Williams v New York City Hous. Auth., 61 AD3d 62, 79-80 [1st Dept 2009]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Persaud v. Walgreens Co.
2018 NY Slip Op 3555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 2955, 149 A.D.3d 560, 50 N.Y.S.3d 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchwald-v-silverman-shin-byrne-pllc-nyappdiv-2017.