Buchsbaum v. Sadler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Buchsbaum v. Sadler

151 S.E. 566, 40 Ga. App. 709, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 656

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 14, 1930

Docket20137

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 151 S.E. 566 (Buchsbaum v. Sadler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchsbaum v. Sadler, 151 S.E. 566, 40 Ga. App. 709, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 656 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. “Except in case of railroad companies, tlie master is not liable to one servant for injuries arising from the negligence or misconduct of other servants about the same business.” Civil Code (1910), § 3129. However, the petition in the instant case, although construed most strongly against the plaintiff, fails to disclose the relationship of master and servant between the defendant and the plaintiff. The ruling in paragraph 1 of the decision in Smith v. W. & A. Railroad Co., 134 Ga. 216 (67 S. E. 818), will not be extended to cover the facts of this case. The petition set forth a cause of action, and the court properly overruled the general demurrer interposed.

Judgment affirmed.

Juice and Bloodworth, concur. Lawrence & Abrahams, for plaintiff in error,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. “Except in case of railroad companies, tlie master is not liable to one servant for injuries arising from the negligence or misconduct of other servants about the same business.” Civil Code (1910), § 3129. However, the petition in the instant case, although construed most strongly against the plaintiff, fails to disclose the relationship of master and servant between the defendant and the plaintiff. The ruling in paragraph 1 of the decision in Smith v. W. & A. Railroad Co., 134 Ga. 216 (67 S. E. 818), will not be extended to cover the facts of this case. The petition set forth a cause of action, and the court properly overruled the general demurrer interposed.

Judgment affirmed.

Juice and Bloodworth, concur. Lawrence & Abrahams, for plaintiff in error,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 S.E. 566, 40 Ga. App. 709, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchsbaum-v-sadler-gactapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack