Buchsbaum v. Nussbacker, Friedman & Goodman, Inc.

179 Misc. 547, 39 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1550
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 Misc. 547 (Buchsbaum v. Nussbacker, Friedman & Goodman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buchsbaum v. Nussbacker, Friedman & Goodman, Inc., 179 Misc. 547, 39 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1550 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, and new trial granted with thirty dollars costs to plaintiff to abide the event.

In the absence of any agreement by plaintiff, express or implied, to pay back any excess of payments on the drawing account over commissions earned, defendant is not entitled to recover such excess from the plaintiff. (Pease Piano Co. v. Taylor, 197 App. Div. 468, affd., 232 N. Y. 504; Carter v. Bradlee, 245 App. Div. 49, 52.) It-was therefore error to grant judgment dismissing* the complaint on the merits and in favor of defendant on its counterclaim. No opinion.

Present — Smith, McCooey and Steinbrink, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Agnew v. Cameron
247 Cal. App. 2d 619 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 Misc. 547, 39 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchsbaum-v-nussbacker-friedman-goodman-inc-nyappterm-1943.