Bucholtz v. Board of Adjustments of City of Ventnor
150 A. 917, 106 N.J.L. 562, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 236
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bucholtz v. Board of Adjustments of City of Ventnor, 150 A. 917, 106 N.J.L. 562, 1930 N.J. LEXIS 236 (N.J. 1930).
150 A. 917 (Bucholtz v. Board of Adjustments of City of Ventnor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.