Bucholtz 306378 v. Shinn

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedSeptember 21, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-01561
StatusUnknown

This text of Bucholtz 306378 v. Shinn (Bucholtz 306378 v. Shinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bucholtz 306378 v. Shinn, (D. Ariz. 2021).

Opinion

1 WO SC 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jeffrey Glenn Bucholtz, No. CV 21-01561-PHX-JAT (CDB) 10 Movant, ORDER 11 vs. 12 David Shinn, et al., 13 Respondents.

14 15 Movant Jeffrey Glenn Bucholtz, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison 16 Complex-Eyman, has submitted a “Motion to Request a Court Appointed Attorney” (Doc. 17 1), which the Clerk of Court filed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 18 § 2254, but which the Court construes as a Motion for Appointment of Counsel. In the 19 Motion, Movant seeks the appointment of counsel to prepare a federal habeas corpus 20 petition. 21 As an initial matter, to invoke the jurisdiction of the federal courts, a litigant must 22 satisfy the threshold requirement imposed by Article III of the Constitution by presenting 23 a live case or controversy. See e.g., Jackson v. California Dep’t of Mental Health, 399 24 F.3d 1069, 1071 (9th Cir. 2005) (citing Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 750 (1984)). To 25 satisfy the case or controversy requirement for purposes of federal habeas corpus, a 26 prisoner must file a petition for habeas corpus relief in which he alleges facts to support 27 that he is “a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court . . . in violation of 28 the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); see 1 Calderon v. Ashmus, 523 U.S. 740 (1998) (state prisoners’ attempt to litigate affirmative 2 statute of limitations defense before filing actual habeas corpus petition held not a 3 justiciable controversy); United States v. Leon, 203 F.3d 162, 164 (2d Cir. 2000) (a federal 4 court lacks jurisdiction to consider the timeliness of a § 2255 petition until a petition is 5 actually filed). Further, a habeas corpus petition must: “(1) specify all the grounds for 6 relief available to the petitioner; (2) state the facts supporting each ground; (3) state the 7 relief requested; (4) be printed, typewritten or legibly handwritten; and (5) be signed under 8 penalty of perjury by the petitioner . . . .” Rule 2(c), foll. 28 U.S.C. § 2254; see 28 U.S.C. 9 § 2242 (a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “shall allege the facts concerning the 10 applicant’s commitment or detention, the name of the person who has custody over him 11 and by virtue of what claim or authority, if known . . . .”). 12 Movant has not filed a petition or either paid the $5.00 filing fee or filed an 13 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Movant therefore fails to satisfy the 14 requirements to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 15 Consequently, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice to Movant commencing a 16 new case by filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, using the court-approved form, 17 and either paying the $5.00 filing fee or filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 18 (Habeas).1 The Clerk of Court will send the court-approved forms to Movant. 19 With respect to the appointment of counsel, “[i]ndigent state prisoners applying for 20 habeas corpus relief are not entitled to appointed counsel unless the circumstances of a 21 particular case indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent due process 22 violations.” Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986). The Court has 23 discretion to appoint counsel when “the interests of justice so require.” 18 U.S.C. 24 § 3006A(a)(2)(B). Movant has not alleged or shown any basis to appoint counsel. 25 Therefore, the Motion will be denied without prejudice to seeking appointment of counsel 26 27 1 Under this Court’s local rule, a habeas corpus petitioner must use the court- approved form when he files a pro se petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, see LRCiv 3.5, and 28 he must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914. if he files a new case as discussed above. 2| ITIS ORDERED: 3 (1) The Court construes Movant’s “Motion to Request a Court Appointed 4| Attorney” (Doc. 1) as a Motion for Appointment of Counsel, and the Motion is denied. 5 (2) | The Clerk of Court must enter a dismissal of this action without prejudice and close this case. 7 (3) | The Clerk of Court must mail Movant a copy of the court-approved form for 8 | filing a Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 9} U.S.C. § 2254 and a copy of the court-approved form for an Application for Leave to 10 | Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Habeas). 11 Dated this 20th day of September, 2021. 12 13 a 3 14 15 _ James A. Teil Org Senior United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Instructions for Filing a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona

1. Who May Use This Form. To use this form, you must be a person who is currently serving a sentence under a judgment against you in a state court. You are asking for relief from the conviction or the sentence on the grounds that your conviction or sentence violates the United States Constitution or other federal law. You also may use this form to challenge a state judgment that imposed a sentence to be served in the future, but you must fill in the name of the state where the judgment was entered. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. This form should not be used in death penalty cases. If you were sentenced to death, you are entitled to the assistance of counsel and you should request the appointment of counsel.

2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.5(a) provides that habeas corpus petitions must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages. The form, however, must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. You do not need to cite law. If you want to file a brief or arguments, you must attach a separate memorandum.

3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury.

4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $5.00. If you are unable to pay the filing fee, you may request permission to proceed in forma pauperis by completing and signing the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis provided with the petition form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allen v. Wright
468 U.S. 737 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Calderon v. Ashmus
523 U.S. 740 (Supreme Court, 1998)
United States v. Daniel James Fowlie
24 F.3d 1059 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Luis G. Leon
203 F.3d 162 (Second Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bucholtz 306378 v. Shinn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bucholtz-306378-v-shinn-azd-2021.