Buchman v. Smith

54 A.2d 775, 140 N.J. Eq. 390
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 12, 1947·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, filed in the Court of Chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, IIei-ier, Colie, Waci-ieneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells,. Dill, Freund, McG-eeiian, McLean, JJ. 13. . For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buchman v. Smith, 54 A.2d 775, 140 N.J. Eq. 390 (N.J. 1947).

54 A.2d 775 (Buchman v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. Reiss
107 A.2d 24 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Johnson v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, MONMOUTH
91 A.2d 580 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)