Buchman v. Prince

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buchman v. Prince

234 A.D. 866

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 866 (Buchman v. Prince) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchman v. Prince, 234 A.D. 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, defendants to have twenty days from service of a copy of the order herein within which to answer the complaint. We refrain at this time from a determination whether the so-called former action involving the counterclaim of the plaintiff’s mother is res judicata as to the plaintiff’s present suit. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, defendants to have twenty days from service of a copy of the order herein within which to answer the complaint. We refrain at this time from a determination whether the so-called former action involving the counterclaim of the plaintiff’s mother is res judicata as to the plaintiff’s present suit. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchman-v-prince-nyappdiv-1931.