Buchman v. Fishbein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Buchman v. Fishbein

537 So. 2d 704, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 344, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 329, 1989 WL 6257

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2677

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 537 So. 2d 704 (Buchman v. Fishbein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchman v. Fishbein, 537 So. 2d 704, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 344, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 329, 1989 WL 6257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and quash the order, as amended, granting the motion to dissolve petitioners’ notice of lis pendens. Hallmark Builders, Inc. v. Hickory Lakes of Brandon, Inc., 458 So.2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

This quashal shall be without prejudice to respondents’ right to prove at any future hearing that such lis pendens is inappropriate. Cacaro v. Swan, 394 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA), petition for review dismissed, 402 So.2d 608 (Fla.1981).

GRANTED.

HERSEY, CJ., and WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI