Buchman v. Fishbein

537 So. 2d 704, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 344, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 329, 1989 WL 6257
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1989·No. No. 88-2677·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and quash the order, as amended, granting the motion to dissolve petitioners’ notice of lis pendens. Hallmark Builders, Inc. v. Hickory Lakes of Brandon, Inc., 458 So.2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

This quashal shall be without prejudice to respondents’ right to prove at any future hearing that such lis pendens is inappropriate. Cacaro v. Swan, 394 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA), petition for review dismissed, 402 So.2d 608 (Fla.1981).

GRANTED.

HERSEY, CJ., and WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buchman v. Fishbein, 537 So. 2d 704, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 344, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 329, 1989 WL 6257 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

537 So. 2d 704 (Buchman v. Fishbein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

305 Developers, LLC v. Buchalter
932 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Lee v. State
537 So. 2d 704 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)