Buchman v. Canard
This text of 863 So. 2d 487 (Buchman v. Canard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert E. BUCHMAN, Appellant,
v.
Nancy CANARD, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*488 Michael A. Nuzzo, Miami; David B. Pakula, for appellant.
Daniels, Kashtan, Downs & Robertson and Madelyn Simon Lozano, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE, and WELLS, JJ.
WELLS, Judge.
Robert E. Buchman appeals an order confirming and ratifying an arbitration award, winding up his partnership with Nancy Canard and distributing partnership assets. That order, among other things, awarded damages to Canard in an amount equal to her proportionate share of those partnership assets wrongfully transferred by Buchman and also awarded prejudgment interest on that amount from the date of the wrongful transfer. On appellee Canard's concession that prejudgment interest should not have been awarded, that portion of the order under review is reversed. See Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So.2d 212, 215 (Fla. 1985); Pharmacy Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. Perschon, 622 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1993). The balance of the order under review is affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
863 So. 2d 487, 2004 WL 87403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchman-v-canard-fladistctapp-2004.