Buchholtz v. Bradley Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buchholtz v. Bradley Contracting Co.

171 A.D. 899, 155 N.Y.S. 1096

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D. 899 (Buchholtz v. Bradley Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchholtz v. Bradley Contracting Co., 171 A.D. 899, 155 N.Y.S. 1096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence is without evidence to sustain it. That finding is, therefore, reversed, the judgment and order appealed from are reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Smith, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence is without evidence to sustain it. That finding is, therefore, reversed, the judgment and order appealed from are reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Smith, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D. 899, 155 N.Y.S. 1096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchholtz-v-bradley-contracting-co-nyappdiv-1915.