Buchert v. Boyertown Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Buchert v. Boyertown Borough

17 A. 190, 1 Monag. 577, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1323

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 18, 1889

DocketNo. 303

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 A. 190 (Buchert v. Boyertown Borough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchert v. Boyertown Borough, 17 A. 190, 1 Monag. 577, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1323 (Pa. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires a reversal of this judgment. The evidence was insufficient to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the learned judge of the common pleas should have affirmed defendant’s point, in which he was asked to direct a verdict in its favor. That, however, was a technical error, of which plaintiff had the benefit, and he is, therefore, not in a position to complain.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

There is nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires a reversal of this judgment. The evidence was insufficient to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the learned judge of the common pleas should have affirmed defendant’s point, in which he was asked to direct a verdict in its favor. That, however, was a technical error, of which plaintiff had the benefit, and he is, therefore, not in a position to complain.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A. 190, 1 Monag. 577, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchert-v-boyertown-borough-pa-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack