Buchart v. Burger

Indiana Supreme Court

Buchart v. Burger

17 N.E. 125, 115 Ind. 123, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 305

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 17, 1888

DocketNo. 13,178

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 17 N.E. 125 (Buchart v. Burger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchart v. Burger, 17 N.E. 125, 115 Ind. 123, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 305 (Ind. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The appellee insists that there is no bill of exceptions in the record. On the back of the bill is written : “ Tendered to me for approval and signature, March 15th, 1886.” This is not sufficient. The statute in express terms requires that “the date of the presentation shall be stated in the bill of exceptions.” R. S. 1881, section 629. It has been expressly decided that a statement on the margin or on the back of the bill is not sufficient. Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 (139).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, J.

The appellee insists that there is no bill of exceptions in the record. On the back of the bill is written : “ Tendered to me for approval and signature, March 15th, 1886.” This is not sufficient. The statute in express terms requires that “the date of the presentation shall be stated in the bill of exceptions.” R. S. 1881, section 629. It has been expressly decided that a statement on the margin or on the back of the bill is not sufficient. Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 (139).

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 N.E. 125, 115 Ind. 123, 1888 Ind. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchart-v-burger-ind-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack