Buchanan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Buchanan v. State

215 P. 1117, 24 Okla. Crim. 41, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 259

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 12, 1923

DocketNo. A-4443.

StatusPublished

This text of 215 P. 1117 (Buchanan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchanan v. State, 215 P. 1117, 24 Okla. Crim. 41, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 259 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error, 0. C. Buchanan and V. 0. Buchanan, were jointly charged, tried, and convicted on an information charging that they did have in their possession whisky with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury the court rendered judgment on the 20th day of March, 1922, and sentenced each of said defendants to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $100 and the costs. From the judgment they appealed, by filing in this count on September 6, 1922, a petition in error with case-made. On the 6th day of June, 1923, their counsel of record filed in this court a motion to dismiss their appeal, which motion is sustained. The appeal herein is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error, 0. C. Buchanan and V. 0. Buchanan, were jointly charged, tried, and convicted on an information charging that they did have in their possession whisky with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury the court rendered judgment on the 20th day of March, 1922, and sentenced each of said defendants to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $100 and the costs. From the judgment they appealed, by filing in this count on September 6, 1922, a petition in error with case-made. On the 6th day of June, 1923, their counsel of record filed in this court a motion to dismiss their appeal, which motion is sustained. The appeal herein is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 P. 1117, 24 Okla. Crim. 41, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchanan-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.