Buchanan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Buchanan v. State

387 S.W.3d 407, 2012 WL 6139005, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1557

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 11, 2012·No. No. ED 98127·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Vernon Buchanan, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Vernon Buchanan, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Buchanan v. State, 387 S.W.3d 407, 2012 WL 6139005, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1557 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

387 S.W.3d 407 (Buchanan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.