Buchanan v. State ex rel. Sanford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Buchanan v. State ex rel. Sanford

167 So. 2d 42

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 25, 1964

DocketNo. 63-886

StatusPublished

This text of 167 So. 2d 42 (Buchanan v. State ex rel. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchanan v. State ex rel. Sanford, 167 So. 2d 42 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the sheriff of Metropolitan Dade County from a judgment in habeas corpus which discharged a prisoner in his custody.

The appellee Joseph W. Sanford was arrested on warrants which charged him with [43]*43drunken driving and reckless driving in violation of provisions of the Metropolitan Dade County traffic code. The trial court to which the warrants were returnable was the Dade County Metropolitan Court.

Sanford filed an action in circuit court in habeas corpus to test the sufficiency of'the charges. The circuit court granted the writ and discharged the petitioner. The grounds of the order of discharge which is now appealed, were that the warrant affidavits (1) were vague and indefinite, (2) were not based on personal knowledge of affiant and (3) charged a mere conclusion, and that therefore the warrants were invalid.

This case is similar in material respects to Buchanan v. State ex rel. Morris, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So.2d 43, decided this date. What we said in disposing of the Morris case is applicable here, and on the authority thereof the judgment appealed from in the instant case should be and hereby is reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI