Buchanan v. State

856 S.W.2d 308, 314 Ark. 129, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Buchanan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 315 Ark. 227
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 19, 1993·No. CR 93-714·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Jessie Lee Buchanan, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Davis Loftin, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buchanan v. State, 856 S.W.2d 308, 314 Ark. 129, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 453 (Ark. 1993).

856 S.W.2d 308 (Buchanan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.