Buchanan v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO

385 U.S. 3, 17 L. Ed. 2d 3, 87 S. Ct. 33, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 543
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1966·No. 115·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

385 U.S. 3 (1966)

BUCHANAN ET AL.
v.
RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.

No. 115.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 10, 1966.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.

Richard M. Markus for appellants.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buchanan v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, 385 U.S. 3, 17 L. Ed. 2d 3, 87 S. Ct. 33, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 543 (1966).

385 U.S. 3 (Buchanan v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rasmussen v. Toia
420 F. Supp. 757 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Thomas Aries Scott v. Edward A. Hill
449 F.2d 634 (Sixth Circuit, 1971)
Overstock Book Co. v. Barry
436 F.2d 1289 (Second Circuit, 1970)
Overstock Book Company, Inc. v. Barry
436 F.2d 1289 (Second Circuit, 1970)
Majuri v. United States
431 F.2d 469 (Third Circuit, 1970)