Buchanan v. Phipps

Fourth Circuit

Buchanan v. Phipps

255 F. App'x 703

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 26, 2007·No. No. 07-7017·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Buchanan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) and denying his request for injunctive relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Buchanan v. Phipps, No. 7:07-cv-00296, 2007 WL 1874189 (W.D.Va. June 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Buchanan appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) and denying his request for injunctive relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Buchanan v. Phipps, No. 7:07-cv-00296, 2007 WL 1874189 (W.D.Va. June 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Buchanan v. Phipps, 255 F. App'x 703 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

255 F. App'x 703 (Buchanan v. Phipps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related