Buchanan v. McCool

102 F. App'x 422
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 9, 2004
Docket03-41717
StatusUnpublished

This text of 102 F. App'x 422 (Buchanan v. McCool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buchanan v. McCool, 102 F. App'x 422 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

James Allen Buchanan, Texas prisoner # 648694, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint for failure to comply with the court’s order to pay a partial filing fee. Although the district court dismissed Buchanan’s suit without prejudice, he is effectively barred from refiling by the two-year statute of limitations. See Burrell v. Newsome, 883 F.2d 416, 418 (5th Cir.1989).

The record does not show that Buchanan’s failure was the result of contumaciousness or an attempt to delay the proceedings. See McNeal v. Papasan, 842 F.2d 787, 790-92 (5th Cir.1988). The record also does not show that the court considered lesser sanctions before dismissing Buchanan’s lawsuit. See Long v. Simmons, 77 F.3d 878, 880 (5th Cir.1996).

The judgment of the district court dismissing Buchanan’s complaint is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Buchanan is cautioned that this opinion does not excuse him from compliance with the orders issued by the district court if the court elects to reinstate those orders upon remand. Buchanan is further cautioned that a failure to comply with the district court’s orders in the future may result in dismissal of his lawsuit.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 F. App'x 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchanan-v-mccool-ca5-2004.