Buchanan v. Ellis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Buchanan v. Ellis

149 S.E. 100, 39 Ga. App. 840, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 583

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 12, 1929

Docket19590

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 149 S.E. 100 (Buchanan v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buchanan v. Ellis, 149 S.E. 100, 39 Ga. App. 840, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 583 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Mrs. Kate C. Buchanan filed suit against Tom Ellis, Eloyd Walden, C. W. Belcher, and Mrs. Kate Belcher, for damages on account of the death of her son, resulting from a collision between a motorcycle, on which her son was riding, and “a Eord car then being operated by the defendants C. W. Belcher and Mrs. Kate Belcher.” Defendants Ellis and Walden filed general demurrers to the petition, which the trial judge sustained. On these rulings sustaining the general demurrers the plaintiff assigns error in her bill of exceptions. The petition set forth no cause of action against defendants Ellis and Walden, and the court properly sustained their demurrers and dismissed the case as to them.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Mrs. Kate C. Buchanan filed suit against Tom Ellis, Eloyd Walden, C. W. Belcher, and Mrs. Kate Belcher, for damages on account of the death of her son, resulting from a collision between a motorcycle, on which her son was riding, and “a Eord car then being operated by the defendants C. W. Belcher and Mrs. Kate Belcher.” Defendants Ellis and Walden filed general demurrers to the petition, which the trial judge sustained. On these rulings sustaining the general demurrers the plaintiff assigns error in her bill of exceptions. The petition set forth no cause of action against defendants Ellis and Walden, and the court properly sustained their demurrers and dismissed the case as to them.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.E. 100, 39 Ga. App. 840, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchanan-v-ellis-gactapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack