Buchanan v. Dickerson, Inc.
61 S.E.2d 187, 232 N.C. 421, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 541
Opinion
The defendant’s exception to the ruling of the court below is without merit. Hinson v. Britt, ante, 379; Hildebrand v. Tel. Co., 216 N.C. 235, 4 S.E. 2d 439; Hardy v. Dahl, 209 N.C. 746, 184 S.E. 480.
No new question is presented which requires elaboration. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buchanan v. Dickerson, Inc., 61 S.E.2d 187, 232 N.C. 421, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 541 (N.C. 1950).
61 S.E.2d 187 (Buchanan v. Dickerson, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Wilmington v. Wright
61 S.E.2d 908 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)