Buchanan v. . Carolina Stores, Inc.

158 S.E. 924, 200 N.C. 792, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 445
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 13, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 158 S.E. 924 (Buchanan v. . Carolina Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buchanan v. . Carolina Stores, Inc., 158 S.E. 924, 200 N.C. 792, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 445 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

There was evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that W. H. Tucker, who bought the beef from plaintiff, was at the time the general manager of defendant’s store at Elk Park, N. O.; that he bought the beef and issued checks and a due bill for the purchase price as such general manager, and that the beef was bought by the said W. H. Tucker to be sold by the defendant at retail in its stores. The evidence was sufficient to show that W. H. Tucker had actual or at least apparent authority as general manager of defendant’s store to buy the beef, and to pay for the same by the checks and due bill signed by him as general manager. Bobbitt & Co. v. Land Co., 191 N. C., 323, 131 S. E., 643.

There was no error in the refusal of the court to allow defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maxwell v. . Distributing Co.
168 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Maxwell v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.
204 N.C. 309 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 S.E. 924, 200 N.C. 792, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchanan-v-carolina-stores-inc-nc-1931.