Buchanan v. . Carolina Stores, Inc.

158 S.E. 924, 200 N.C. 792, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 445
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 13, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

There was evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that W. H. Tucker, who bought the beef from plaintiff, was at the time the general manager of defendant’s store at Elk Park, N. O.; that he bought the beef and issued checks and a due bill for the purchase price as such general manager, and that the beef was bought by the said W. H. Tucker to be sold by the defendant at retail in its stores. The evidence was sufficient to show that W. H. Tucker had actual or at least apparent authority as general manager of defendant’s store to buy the beef, and to pay for the same by the checks and due bill signed by him as general manager. Bobbitt & Co. v. Land Co., 191 N. C., 323, 131 S. E., 643.

There was no error in the refusal of the court to allow defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. The judgment is affirmed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buchanan v. . Carolina Stores, Inc., 158 S.E. 924, 200 N.C. 792, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 445 (N.C. 1931).

158 S.E. 924 (Buchanan v. . Carolina Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maxwell v. . Distributing Co.
168 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Maxwell v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.
204 N.C. 309 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)