Buchanan v. Buchanan

Supreme Court of Florida

Buchanan v. Buchanan

18 So. 2d 7, 154 Fla. 396, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 714

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 29, 1944·Published

Opinions

From a full and careful consideration of the transcript of the evidence in this case, I am definitely convinced that the weight of the evidence showed that appellee was guilty of adultery as charged by appellant and that, therefore, she is not entitled to a decree for either alimony or for suit money.

I, therefore, reach the conclusion that the decree should be reversed with directions that decree be entered in favor of appellant.

So ordered.

BROWN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

From a full and careful consideration of the transcript of the evidence in this case, I am definitely convinced that the weight of the evidence showed that appellee was guilty of adultery as charged by appellant and that, therefore, she is not entitled to a decree for either alimony or for suit money.

I, therefore, reach the conclusion that the decree should be reversed with directions that decree be entered in favor of appellant.

So ordered.

BROWN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ., dissent.

Buchanan v. Buchanan, 18 So. 2d 7, 154 Fla. 396, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 714 (Fla. 1944).

Pincite

18 So. 2d 7 (Buchanan v. Buchanan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.