Buchanan v. Arrington
This text of 174 S.E. 666 (Buchanan v. Arrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
W. C. Arrington and Company, Incorporated, instituted this suit for the purpose of enforcing a mechanic’s lien which it had perfected on the property of Nellie C. Wright. Numerous mechanic lien creditors, including appellants, filed their separate petitions in the same cause and for the same purpose.
The chancellor held that complainant and the Building Supplies Corporation, another lien creditor, were entitled [388]*388to the entire sum due by the owner to the general contractor. Eleven of the respondents sought and obtained this appeal. The claim of each is less than $300. This brings the case within the influence of the decision in Gilman v. Ryan, 95 Va. 494, 28 S. E. 875.
For the reasons there stated, the motion to dismiss the appeal, as improvidently awarded, is sustained.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 S.E. 666, 162 Va. 387, 1934 Va. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchanan-v-arrington-va-1934.