Buchanan Bros. v. Smith
This text of 140 So. 775 (Buchanan Bros. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The final decree in this case should be affirmed on the authority of Lake Mabel Development Corp. v. Bird, 99 Fla. 253, 126 Sou. Rep. 356; Day v. Weadock, 101 Fla. 333, 134 Sou. Rep. 525, holding that a final decree in equity will be affirmed where entire ease shows errors, if any, in pleading or procedure, have not resulted in a miscarriage of justice.
But said decree should be modified so as to divide the *1131 costs and impose such costs, both in the lower court and in this court, equally upon complainants and defendants it appearing that neither of the adverse parties has been diligent in avoiding the necessity for the expenses of this litigation. Chandler v. Sherman, 16 Fla. 99.
Modified and affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield and Ellis, J.J., concur.
Terrell, J., dissents.
Brown, J., not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 So. 775, 103 Fla. 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buchanan-bros-v-smith-fla-1932.