Buccino v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

Connecticut Superior Court

Buccino v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

1 Conn. Supp. 88, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 38

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 19, 1935·No. File #44731·Published

Opinion

BALDWIN, J.

The plaintiff moves that the defendant be

required to make its second and third defenses more specific “by stating more particularly in what paragraph or paragraphs of the complaint are contained the cause of action as to which” each such defense is interposed.

It is apparent upon a reading of the complaint and these defenses that neither defense is addressed to any particular paragraph or paragraphs. These defenses are each addressed to the cause of action itself which is set up in the complaint as a whole and not to a specific paragraph or paragraphs.

If the plaintiff thinks that neither defense is good, he may test such question by demurrer.

The motion is denied

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BALDWIN, J.

The plaintiff moves that the defendant be

required to make its second and third defenses more specific “by stating more particularly in what paragraph or paragraphs of the complaint are contained the cause of action as to which” each such defense is interposed.

It is apparent upon a reading of the complaint and these defenses that neither defense is addressed to any particular paragraph or paragraphs. These defenses are each addressed to the cause of action itself which is set up in the complaint as a whole and not to a specific paragraph or paragraphs.

If the plaintiff thinks that neither defense is good, he may test such question by demurrer.

The motion is denied

Buccino v. Singer Manufacturing Co., 1 Conn. Supp. 88, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 38 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

1 Conn. Supp. 88 (Buccino v. Singer Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.