Buccina v. Mid Am Recovery Services, Inc.
This text of 732 So. 2d 439 (Buccina v. Mid Am Recovery Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant challenges the temporary injunction forbidding him from soliciting ap-pellee’s customers or employees. Appellant’s employment contract with appellee, a consumer debt collection service, contained a noncompete agreement that, ap-pellee claims, appellant had breached. We have found no error regarding entry of the injunction, but remand for factual findings and for an evidentiary hearing on the proper amount of bond. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610; Richard v. Behavioral Healthcare Options, Inc., 647 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
732 So. 2d 439, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5644, 1999 WL 270317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buccina-v-mid-am-recovery-services-inc-fladistctapp-1999.