Bucci v. Popovich

116 A. 923, 93 N.J. Eq. 511, 8 Stock. 511, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 331
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 9, 1922·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayzb, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bucci v. Popovich, 116 A. 923, 93 N.J. Eq. 511, 8 Stock. 511, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 331 (N.J. 1922).

116 A. 923 (Bucci v. Popovich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fire Guard Sprinkler Corp. v. Manolio
408 A.2d 1353 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
In Re Estate of Rauch
401 A.2d 271 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Corradini v. v. & M. HOLDING CORP.
112 A.2d 603 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Dinges v. Dinges
65 A.2d 107 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)
Taylor v. Borgfeld
50 A.2d 654 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Kahn v. Rockhill
25 A.2d 4 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Walker v. Bennett
152 A. 9 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Mullen v. Mullen
129 A. 749 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)