Bucchere v. Brinker International, Inc.
This text of 950 A.2d 493 (Bucchere v. Brinker International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The plaintiffs unsuccessfully sought orders granting them class certification in actions in which they claimed that the defendants had failed to pay them the required minimum wage. After the trial court denied the plaintiffs’ requests for class certification, they appealed to the Appellate Court. That court dismissed the appeals for lack of a final judgment, and we granted certification on the question of whether an *706 order denying class certification is a final judgment. 1 In Palmer v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp., 285 Conn. 462, 482, 940 A.2d 742 (2008), we answered that question by holding that such an order is not a final judgment. After ordering the parties to file briefs on why the Appellate Court’s judgments of dismissal should not be affirmed in light of our decision in that case, we now affirm the Appellate Court’s judgments.
The judgments of the Appellate Court are affirmed.
In both of these cases, we granted the plaintiffs’ petitions for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: “Is an order denying a motion for class certification a final judgment for purposes of appeal?” Bucchere v. Brinker International, Inc., 280 Conn. 938, 910 A.2d 217 (2006); Orozco v. Darden Restaurants, Inc., 280 Conn. 939, 910 A.2d 218 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
950 A.2d 493, 287 Conn. 704, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bucchere-v-brinker-international-inc-conn-2008.