Buccellato v. CGF Health System

284 A.D.2d 939, 726 N.Y.S.2d 325, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5813
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 2001·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for extreme emotional distress following exposure to an alleged disease-causing substance. Defendant established its entitlement to [940] judgment as a matter of law by submitting proof that plaintiffs claim of extreme emotional distress was not supported by the requisite medical evidence, and plaintiff failed to raise a material issue of fact (see, Glendora v Walsh, 227 AD2d 377, 377378, lv denied 88 NY2d 812, cert denied 519 US 1122; Erani v Flax, 193 AD2d 777). Although plaintiff alleges that she suffers from anxiety, she has never sought any medical treatment for that condition. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buccellato v. CGF Health System, 284 A.D.2d 939, 726 N.Y.S.2d 325, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 939 (Buccellato v. CGF Health System) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erani v. Flax
193 A.D.2d 777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Glendora v. Walsh
227 A.D.2d 377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)