Buccanon v. New York City Transit Authority
This text of 7 A.D.2d 853 (Buccanon v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall from the platform to the tracks in a subway station, the trial court set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff Rose Buccanon and directed a verdict in favor of defendant. The appeal is from the judgment entered thereon. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, Murphy and Hallman, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Kleinfeld, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial on the ground that the evidence was sufficient to create an issue of fact for determination by the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.D.2d 853, 182 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buccanon-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1959.