Bucalos v. Schubert
174 A.D. 916
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the [917]*917event, on the ground that the finding by the jury that the operator of the car was engaged in the business of the master at the time of the casualty is contrary to the evidence. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bucalos v. Schubert, 174 A.D. 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
174 A.D. 916 (Bucalos v. Schubert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.