Bucalos v. Schubert
174 A.D. 916
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 174 A.D. 916 (Bucalos v. Schubert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bucalos v. Schubert, 174 A.D. 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the [917]*917event, on the ground that the finding by the jury that the operator of the car was engaged in the business of the master at the time of the casualty is contrary to the evidence. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 A.D. 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bucalos-v-schubert-nyappdiv-1916.