Bucalo v. Weiss
185 N.E.2d 13, 12 N.Y.2d 661, 232 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 1020
This text of 185 N.E.2d 13 (Bucalo v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bucalo v. Weiss, 185 N.E.2d 13, 12 N.Y.2d 661, 232 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 1020 (N.Y. 1962).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs, upon the sole ground that petitioner failed to review; in court the determination made by the [663]*663Board of Elections that his petition contained an insufficient number of valid signatures. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fboessel, Van Voobhis, Bubke and Fosteb. Taking no part: Judge Ftjld.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
185 N.E.2d 13, 12 N.Y.2d 661, 232 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bucalo-v-weiss-ny-1962.