Bublitz v. Borough of Hillsdale

152 A. 922, 9 N.J. Misc. 238, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 449
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 23, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 152 A. 922 (Bublitz v. Borough of Hillsdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bublitz v. Borough of Hillsdale, 152 A. 922, 9 N.J. Misc. 238, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 449 (N.J. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A previous application was made to Mr. Justice Parker at chambers. His conclusions appear in Bublitz v. Hillsdale, 8 N. J. Mis. R. 334. A further consideration of the matter by the three judges sitting in Part II lead to the same result as that expressed in those conclusions.

The writ will be denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 A. 922, 9 N.J. Misc. 238, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bublitz-v-borough-of-hillsdale-nj-1931.