Bubeck v. Commissioner

1986 T.C. Memo. 378, 52 T.C.M. 198, 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 230
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedAugust 14, 1986
DocketDocket No. 34900-83.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1986 T.C. Memo. 378 (Bubeck v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bubeck v. Commissioner, 1986 T.C. Memo. 378, 52 T.C.M. 198, 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 230 (tax 1986).

Opinion

DALENE T. BUBECK, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Bubeck v. Commissioner
Docket No. 34900-83.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1986-378; 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 230; 52 T.C.M. (CCH) 198; T.C.M. (RIA) 86378;
August 14, 1986.
Kevin O. O'Brien, for the petitioner.
James B. Martin, Jr., for the respondent.

SHIELDS

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

SHIELDS, Judge: Respondent determined*231 a deficiency in petitioner's income tax for 1981 in the amount of $652.00 and an addition to tax under section 6653(a) 1 in the amount of $32.60. There are two issues for decision: (1) Whether respondent correctly determined the tip income received by petitioner during 1981; and (2) whether petitioner is liable for the addition to tax under section 6653(a) for negligence or the intentional disregard of rules and regulations.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation and attached exhibits are incorporated herein by reference.

Petitioner resided during 1981 and at the time of filing her petition in Denver, Colorado. In 1981 she worked as a waitress at a restaurant called Baby Doe's Matchless Mining (Baby Doe's). She began working at Baby Doe's in February and worked through June and again from September through December. She worked a total of 849.5 hours, 123 as a cocktail server, 707.25 as*232 a food server on both day and night shifts, and 19.25 at employee meetings. The hours worked as a food server included 55 hours during which petitioner trained new employees. Under Baby Doe's policy, a trainer was entitled to all tips earned by the trainer or her trainee.

Food servers at Baby Doe's worked from one of several stations at the restaurant. They were rotated from station to station, with a complete rotation taking approximately two months. It was Baby Doe's policy to rotate the food servers impartially, fairly, and evenly.

Petitioner was paid biweekly. Each salary check reflected the hourly wages for the two-week period as well as the amount of tip income she had reported to Baby Doe's for such period. 2 It was petitioner's responsibility to keep account of her tip income and report it to Baby Doe's on a biweekly basis. During 1981, petitioner reported to Baby Doe's tip income totaling $831.95.

During her first period of employment, from February through June, petitioner recorded her tips daily in*233 a notebook kept in her car. From September through December she recorded the tips on separate sheets of paper, which also were kept in her car. After each period of employment she destroyed the records.

Respondent determined the tip income of petitioner by using the charge sales records of the restaurant. Using a 28-day sample of credit card receipts reflecting tips, which sample was taken randomly from all of Baby Doe's credit card receipts in 1981, respondent determined that on the average day shift food servers received tips of $4.74 per hour, night shift food servers received tips of $5.85 per hour, and cocktail servers received tips of $4.87 per hour. 3 With these averages, respondent determined that petitioner had unreported tip income of $3,512.64 as follows:

Category WorkedHoursRateTotal
Day Shift Food Server353.00 4$4.74$1,673.22
Night Shift Food Server354.255.852,072.36
Cocktail Server123.004.87599.01
Total Tip Income$4,344.59
Tip Income Reported to Baby Doe's831.95
Unreported Tip Income$3,512.64

*234 OPINION

(1) Tip Income

Tips are includable in gross income since they constitute compensation for services rendered. Section 61(a); section 1.61-2(a)(1), Income Tax Regs.; Killoran v. Commissioner,709 F.2d 31 (9th Cir. 1983), affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-659; Roberts v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welch v. Helvering
290 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Roberts v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
176 F.2d 221 (Ninth Circuit, 1949)
Roberts v. Commissioner
10 T.C. 581 (U.S. Tax Court, 1948)
Sutherland v. Commissioner
32 T.C. 862 (U.S. Tax Court, 1959)
Schroeder v. Commissioner
40 T.C. 30 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)
Meneguzzo v. Commissioner
43 T.C. 824 (U.S. Tax Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1986 T.C. Memo. 378, 52 T.C.M. 198, 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bubeck-v-commissioner-tax-1986.