Bubb v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.

93 A. 276, 247 Pa. 231, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 813
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 2, 1915
DocketAppeal, No. 55
StatusPublished

This text of 93 A. 276 (Bubb v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bubb v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co., 93 A. 276, 247 Pa. 231, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 813 (Pa. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff in this case was injured while a passenger in the defendant’s car, in the same accident in which the plaintiff in Dunlap v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Company was injured. In that case the opinion of the court has been filed. The only question raised by the assignments is whether there was error in refusing a new trial on the ground that the verdict was excessive. For the reasons stated in the opinion referred to, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A. 276, 247 Pa. 231, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bubb-v-pittsburgh-harmony-butler-new-castle-railway-co-pa-1915.