Bubb v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.
This text of 93 A. 276 (Bubb v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in this case was injured while a passenger in the defendant’s car, in the same accident in which the plaintiff in Dunlap v. Pittsburgh, Harmony, Butler & New Castle Railway Company was injured. In that case the opinion of the court has been filed. The only question raised by the assignments is whether there was error in refusing a new trial on the ground that the verdict was excessive. For the reasons stated in the opinion referred to, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 A. 276, 247 Pa. 231, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bubb-v-pittsburgh-harmony-butler-new-castle-railway-co-pa-1915.