BUBASH v. Holt
297 S.W.3d 597, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1254, 2009 WL 2870491
Opinion
ORDER
James and Patricia Bubash appeal from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding in favor of the defendant, Bill Holt, on his counterclaim in this breach-of-contract action. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(3) & (5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BUBASH v. Holt, 297 S.W.3d 597, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1254, 2009 WL 2870491 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
297 S.W.3d 597 (BUBASH v. Holt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hogan
297 S.W.3d 597 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)