BUBASH v. Holt

Missouri Court of Appeals

BUBASH v. Holt

297 S.W.3d 597, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1254, 2009 WL 2870491

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 8, 2009

DocketED 91776

StatusPublished

This text of 297 S.W.3d 597 (BUBASH v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BUBASH v. Holt, 297 S.W.3d 597, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1254, 2009 WL 2870491 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James and Patricia Bubash appeal from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding in favor of the defendant, Bill Holt, on his counterclaim in this breach-of-contract action. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(3) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James and Patricia Bubash appeal from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding in favor of the defendant, Bill Holt, on his counterclaim in this breach-of-contract action. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(3) & (5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 S.W.3d 597, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1254, 2009 WL 2870491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bubash-v-holt-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack