BSR Surf Resort, LLC, Parsons Barefoot Ski Ranch, LLC, BSR Cable Park, Stuart Edward Parsons, Jr. as Trustee for Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust, and Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust v. Rita Stabile, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Fabrizio Stabile, and Vincenzo Stabile, Individually

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 24, 2020
Docket10-20-00006-CV
StatusPublished

This text of BSR Surf Resort, LLC, Parsons Barefoot Ski Ranch, LLC, BSR Cable Park, Stuart Edward Parsons, Jr. as Trustee for Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust, and Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust v. Rita Stabile, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Fabrizio Stabile, and Vincenzo Stabile, Individually (BSR Surf Resort, LLC, Parsons Barefoot Ski Ranch, LLC, BSR Cable Park, Stuart Edward Parsons, Jr. as Trustee for Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust, and Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust v. Rita Stabile, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Fabrizio Stabile, and Vincenzo Stabile, Individually) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BSR Surf Resort, LLC, Parsons Barefoot Ski Ranch, LLC, BSR Cable Park, Stuart Edward Parsons, Jr. as Trustee for Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust, and Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust v. Rita Stabile, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Fabrizio Stabile, and Vincenzo Stabile, Individually, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-20-00006-CV

BSR SURF RESORT, LLC, PARSONS BAREFOOT SKI RANCH, LLC, BSR CABLE PARK, STUART EDWARD PARSONS, JR. AS TRUSTEE FOR PARSONS RANCH & WILDLIFE TRUST, AND PARSONS RANCH & WILDLIFE TRUST, Appellants v.

RITA STABILE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF FABRIZIO STABILE, AND VINCENZO STABILE, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees

From the 414th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019-1249-5

REFERRAL TO MEDIATION ORDER

The Legislature has provided for the resolution of disputes through alternative

dispute resolution (ADR) procedures. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 154.001-

154.073. The policy behind ADR is stated in the statute: “It is the policy of this state to encourage the peaceable resolution of disputes . . . and the early settlement of pending

litigation through voluntary settlement procedures.” Id. § 154.002. Mediation is a form

of ADR. Mediation is a mandatory but non-binding settlement conference, conducted

with the assistance of a mediator. Mediation is private, confidential, and privileged.

We find that not only this appeal, but also the underlying case in this appeal, Trial

Court Number 2019-1249-5, are appropriate for mediation. See id. § 154.021(a).

Accordingly, we refer both this appeal and the underlying case, Trial Court Number

2019-1249-5, to mediation.1

The parties are ordered to confer and attempt to agree upon a mediator. Within

fourteen (14) days after the date of this Order, Appellants are ordered to file a notice with

the Clerk of this Court that either identifies the agreed-upon mediator or states that the

parties are unable to agree upon a mediator. If the notice states that the parties are unable

to agree upon a mediator, this Court will assign a mediator.

Mediation must occur within sixty (60) days after the date the above-referenced

notice agreeing to a mediator is filed or, if no mediator is agreed upon, within sixty (60)

days after the date of the order assigning a mediator.

No less than seven (7) calendar days before the first scheduled mediation session,

each party must provide the mediator and all other parties with an information sheet

setting forth the party’s positions about the issues that need to be resolved. At or before

the first session, all parties must produce all information necessary for the mediator to

1 We note that pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 51.014(a)(12) and (b) that the trial and all other proceedings are stayed pending resolution of this appeal.

BSR Surf Resort, LLC v. Stabile Page 2 understand the issues presented. The mediator may require any party to supplement the

information required by this Order.

Named parties must be present during the entire mediation process, and each

party that is not a natural person must be represented by an employee, officer, agent, or

representative with authority to bind the party to settlement.

Immediately after mediation, the mediator must advise this Court, in writing, only

that the case did or did not settle and the amount of the mediator’s fee paid by each party.

The mediator’s fees will be taxed as costs. Unless the mediator agrees to mediate without

fee, the mediator must negotiate a reasonable fee with the parties, and the parties must

each pay one-half of the agreed-upon fee directly to the mediator.

Failure or refusal to attend the mediation as scheduled may result in the

imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law.

Any objection to this Order must be filed with this Court and served upon all

parties within ten (10) days after the date of this Order, or it is waived.

We refer this appeal and the underlying case, Trial Court No. 2019-1249-5, to

mediation.2

The appeal and all appellate deadlines are suspended as of the date of this Order.

The suspension of the appeal is automatically lifted when the mediator’s report to the

Court is received. If the matter is not resolved at mediation, any deadline that began to

run and had not expired by the date of this Order will begin anew as of the date the

2 Nothing herein should be construed as an all or nothing requirement regarding the mediation. The mediator and parties should endeavor to resolve the entire proceeding, but a resolution of any issue in the appeal or the underlying proceeding is within the scope of this referral.

BSR Surf Resort, LLC v. Stabile Page 3 mediator’s report to the Court is received. Any document filed by a party after the date

of this Order and prior to the filing of the mediator’s report will be deemed filed on the

same day, but after, the mediator’s report is received.

Appellants’ Renewed Motion for Emergency Relief will be held in abeyance

pending the resolution of mediation.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Order issued and filed February 24, 2020 RWR

BSR Surf Resort, LLC v. Stabile Page 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 154.001
Texas CP § 154.001
§ 51.014
Texas CP § 51.014(a)(12)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BSR Surf Resort, LLC, Parsons Barefoot Ski Ranch, LLC, BSR Cable Park, Stuart Edward Parsons, Jr. as Trustee for Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust, and Parsons Ranch & Wildlife Trust v. Rita Stabile, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Fabrizio Stabile, and Vincenzo Stabile, Individually, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bsr-surf-resort-llc-parsons-barefoot-ski-ranch-llc-bsr-cable-park-texapp-2020.