BSL Investments, II, LLC v. Fresh Frozen Foods, Inc.

679 F. App'x 979
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 2017
DocketNo. 16-14255 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 679 F. App'x 979 (BSL Investments, II, LLC v. Fresh Frozen Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BSL Investments, II, LLC v. Fresh Frozen Foods, Inc., 679 F. App'x 979 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a contract dispute arising from an escrow agreement between BSL Investments and Fresh Frozen Foods. BSL filed a complaint in district court seeking a declaratory judgment that, among other things, Fresh Frozen Foods is not entitled to escrow funds governed by the agreement. The district court granted summary judgment to Fresh Frozen Foods. The court found that Fresh Frozen Foods requested access to the escrow funds as indemnification for damages it suffered from dealings with BSL; BSL failed to timely dispute the request; and under the plain language of the escrow agreement, BSL’s failure waived BSL’s right to contest the request. BSL appeals the district court’s summary judgment decision.

After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm substantially for reasons set forth in the district court’s thorough opinion. See BSL Investments, II, LLC v. Fresh Frozen Foods, Inc., No. 1:15-cv-02136 (N.D. Ga. June 16, 2016).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hutton v. McDaniel
264 F. Supp. 3d 996 (D. Arizona, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 F. App'x 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bsl-investments-ii-llc-v-fresh-frozen-foods-inc-ca11-2017.